Nearly every parent feels very strongly about vaccines, whether they’re pro-vax or anti-vax. Of course everyone’s entitled to his or her own opinion, but the problem arises when they try to force their behavior onto others.
You vaccinate, so you’re going to try to force me to vaccinate, too. I’m ant-vax, so I’m going to try to keep you from vaccinating. Wrong! As with everything in life, it should be a choice, but not a decision entered into lightly. It should be an INFORMED choice. Research the vaccines and diseases. Read the vaccine insert. Find out what you’re choosing and why.
This may stop many people from reading any further, but I’m telling you anyway: I’m opposed to vaccines. I’ve done countless hours of online research, read numerous books, and read vaccine inserts. Therefore, I have made an INFORMED decision. I do not believe that the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks.
That should be the end of it. That’s my decision (well, mine and my husband’s for our family), and no one should try to force me to go against it. But I said “should”.
Many parents of vaccinated children believe that unvaccinated children should be made to get vaccinated to keep up the herd immunity. For some odd reason, they are afraid that their vaccinated children may get sick, with the disease that they were vaccinated against, from the unvaccinated children. You’d think they’d have more confidence in the vaccines they’re so supportive of.
One argument is that some children can’t receive certain vaccines because of various health issues, so my children should be vaccinated to protect those children. My question is: Then who is going to protect MY child from the poisons of the vaccines?
Why should I expose MY children to the risks of vaccines in order to protect YOUR child? Why is YOUR child’s life more important than MY child’s life?
The diseases do come with risks, but so do the vaccines. They both carry the risk of death. If my child receives a vaccine, it is certain that he or she may die from the guaranteed exposure to the vaccine. If your child is not vaccinated, there is no guarantee that he or she will ever even be exposed to the disease (like with polio).
Both diseases and vaccines carry risks. So, if it’s all about protection, how do you decide which child to throw under the bus? Should I potentially damage my child with vaccines for your child’s sake? Should your child risk possibly, at some point in life, being exposed to an illness that may or may not make him or her very sick and possibly have potential complications?
Most of the risks of diseases are known. The risks of vaccines are not only not known, but are also often disputed, inconclusive, and/or not found out until many years later (like with the SV40 contamination in polio vaccines and pig-wasting virus contamination in the rotavirus vaccines), which is admitted in the vaccine inserts that state that the vaccine “has not been tested for carcinogenic or mutagenic effect”. Yes, years ago before humans had the medical technology, such as intravenous fluids and antibiotics, most diseases were a death sentence. That’s not the case now though. There are many treatment options available nowadays.
So, to return to my earlier question, which child do you decide to throw under the bus? Well, YOU decide for YOUR family, and I’ll decide for MINE, but if you think I should throw MY kid under the bus with vaccination for the sake of YOUR child, I’ll tell you right now, you’d better have a back-up plan!